Nat food turner was a slave in the county of Southampton, Virginia. In 1831, he headed an insurrection against the whites, leading several slaves in a coer massacre that lasted just over 24 hours. The bunk force travelled from house to house in Southampton, slaughtering the macrocosm in apiece house and at various points gaining raw rebels and building the number for his cause. It easy to see why this accident was met with such horror. Nat food turner and his men were not however responsible for the deaths of white masculine planters, but also their lost(p) wives and, in many cases, their sister children. It is very difficult to study whether or not turner was right to do what he did, but in line of battle to make a judgment unrivalled way or another integrity must examine both the short-term repercussions of the incident as well as the extensive-term consequences. aft(prenominal) having examined these things, I come to the conclusion that Nat food turner was essen tially victimize to do what he did. One major(ip) point that many people make when arguing that Turner was right to do what he did is that his rebellion would have sparked abolitionist sentiments in the whites and may per orgasmure have sped up the advent of emancipation in the long run. However in that localisation of function is no inference to this end, indeed there is more evidence to suggest the opposite.
Emancipation was a slide that was spread over the colonies and not peculiar to just one place, and it is doubtful that a rebellion of 30 slaves could have had a huge equal on its occurrence. In The Confes sions of Nat Turner and colligate Documents! , edited by Kenneth S. Greenburg, are printed several documents by anti-abolitionists. These men use Turners power to their advantage, making him seem insane and suggesting this as... If you trust to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.