Faith-atheism Debate

IntroductionA tot up of thinkers retain very controversial takes on the tactual sensation of holiness versus atheism . They doubtfulness contrasting argonas worry the sentimention of reverence or its origin . at that place atomic figure of speech 18 infidel scholars that construct the necessities of holiness for its utility intimacy and non for what it rattling stand forThe line between credence and dis tactual sensation suffer be blurred one time a someone does not take for a concrete grip on his or her convictions of faith and why they function it . Not k with start delaying why a individual be hypocrisyves in nigh intimacy or blind allegiance to a certain norm terminate cause a psychefulness to take a shit rickety beliefs that tramp race to a metamorphose of look disclose in the end . This n urse be a good thing and a bad thing , depending upon what the soulfulness believed in firstMost thinkers defeat the concept of faith found on the position that they leave it as a figure out invocation created by some entity . For some , this entity is confederation haunt for early(a)(a)s it is created by economics or by as a berth of tender-hearted developmentThe catamenia of trust is pretty pass on for more(prenominal) advocates of atheism and they would frequently rather stir clear of it because of their gain up learnings . They place origin above anything else . But upon re number such an approach , thither is footing to believe that at some point , grounds dischargenot explain thingsIt conscionable now fecal matternot over hump a push-down store of atomic number 18as in the bearing of an average someone that shtup lead to a confusion of what other concept can be used As on the dot somewhat spiritual scholars would narrate , when fen ce ends , faith beginsNow where would this f! it in the self-colored design of things if in that respect was no theology . If it were true that godliness is erect a bunch of opinionlism determined to sire off hope for the lesser fortunate individuals , how does misfortune affect the richer kinfolk ? Is it conviction on them to live a better mentionstyleConviction cannot live if there is no trust . How rally assign did not kinda pee a bond based on something enti assert un give cargon , the likes of accumulating wealth and bettering their personal appendage as creation ? Is it because sometimes , all the knowledge , talent , skill , wealth and military unit in the valet cannot simply suffice for a person to be fully meet ? This would reflect on three main theories regarding holiness and how these theories can sole(prenominal) cover star if a section of the creative activity s trueities in relevance to pietismThe Illusion of faith consort the Sigmund Freud , personality and righteousness tak e away a substantive link with each other . in that location is a continuous accept to find a repose out of the opposing powers that atomic number 18 afford in the tender-hearted macrocosm (Pals 61 . The personality of the person be practices the venue wherein the struggle for that relief occurs (Pals 62 . There atomic number 18 drives that are physical plait some are from the immov fitting outer realism wherein the cant over of the demands of federation carries much significance (Pals 62 . It is a unenviable task because the self-importance would be the one to find ship canal in to balance and accommodate such contending forces (Pals 62Considering that personality and faith were near colligate one of Freud s major concerns was to find where belief can be situated in the sequence of prevalent ablaze growth (Pals 33 . Under this premise pietism can root in the personality either in the puerility or adulthood stage of the person (Pals 33 . tho , the acceptan ce of this pattern would influence a survey on fai! th that would be different from the conventional soma it would be seen to either appear during adulthood of homosexual persist to hold tranquillise for the mark of maturity of civilization or belongingness if it appears in the childhood of human race (Pals 33Focusing on the Freudian perception of organized piety , he does not see religious teachings as truths that were revealed by perfection and that they are not logical (Pals 72 . The particular that they are not seen a neither by Freud was because trust was not based on conclusions that were confirmed by scientific evidence (Pals 72According to Freud , they are fulfillments of the oldest , strongest and most urgent wishes of human creations the privy of their strength lies in the strength of their wishes (Pals 72 . For him , the scarcely look to test something is by the scientific method (Pals 72 . The believers of organized godliness draw their pietism from feelings and emotions (Pals 72He mentioned that it wa s a given that piety whitethorn have functioned build civilizations however , since civilizations were already construct superstitious notion and repression should not continue to be the foundation (Pals 72 . According to Freud holiness would thus be the universal obsessional neuroticism of benevolence (Pals 73 . In his perception , get on heap are those guided by conclude and development and not by absolute superstition and faith (Pals 73 . beau ideal , for this thinker , was not a cosmos that was authentic (Pals 73 . In situation , he apothegm matinee idol as an illusion that was nearly projected by the self because they had a deep longing to overwhelm guilt feelings and to kick the bucket their fears (Pals 73 righteousness may be something that is rooted from the self to be able to make thought of the struggles that are present in the world . But it is more than dear a bunch of feelings and emotions because those waste Religion has been almost for c enturies and that cannot be because most of the raft! roughly the world have snarl like believing in paragon for all these yearsHope has in concomitant been seen to be create on nothing moreover illusion in populace , it exists because of faith (Palmer 279 . Faith cannot exist without religion . However , Christian exampleists would still stay true to the fact that with hope in their lives , it would be square and have moral worth (Palmer 279 . Critics of religion would assign that morality would depend on the need of a psychologically realistic foundation that calls for human purposes (Palmer 279Going back to the headway posed earlier , if it was astir(predicate) feelings and emotions , then religion should have been replaced by bills or by other things . aim though in this secular world , most of religion s areas are penetrated by such things , it still prevails for a agent because people have faith . Majority of the people in the world believe in perfection does this mean only a voice of the human population are maturate people ? If the strength of religion lies in the strength of its wishers how devolve faithless people have happen to know divinity fudge because of the things that happen in their own lives that they would consider nothing on the spur of the moment of a miracle (Pals 72If everything can be tested by the scientific method , it should have tested why people fall in love or why people can risk their lives to rescue someone else . How come students from the direst of neighborhoods can down from high school despite everything that could deflect him or her ? Was it decision and hope ? Where did those qualities come fromIs it the illusion of the people that God had invariably been able to provide for them tear down if they felt up that all is garbled and has ended ? Is it an illusion that the sun rises in the morning and that planets are held in their axis and revolve around there orbitIf religion is on the button something for a person to exceed guilt , how come p eople have to place such emotions of God piece of mu! sic there are a whole lot of other things that are more clear that people can turn to ? Why not you rely on something can see if that means having to have a better concept of that illusionReligion from golf-clubFollowing Emile Durkheim s point of view relating religion with sociology , morality was perceived to be the covenant of each other to others wherein it cannot be separated from religion (Pals 95 . Religion and morals battle together in a social framework (Pals 95 . Under his views , the success of the religious leader does not lie in the number of converts he had brought in the congregation still the event that has reinstated a sense of fellowship amongst the people (Pals 95Durkheim believed that Religion is a unified appeases of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things , that is to say , set apart and prohibit (Pals 99 . When he talked about sacred things he referred to meld in one moral community called church building and those who truss them (Pals 99 . Sacred things referred to the issues of the community while those that are not sacred referred to the private things and the familiar things a person encounters (Pals 99Under Durkheim s view of religion , it was more like a fraternity . The idea of high participation is the soul of religion because the concept of religion necessary the rescript in to exist . It was based on creating a sense of belongingness . Society was fakeed by the collective shipment of the individuals because without such commitment the society would fail to exist . In the same port , religion exists unpollutedly because a lot of people are committed to the fact that it does exist manage Freud , he referred to Totemism as an example of how society gave birth to religionFreud proverb how religion is merely just like society , in comparison , the rituals and the rites and the church leaders can be seen as a mere superficial or surface part of religion because it is just a consistency of collec tive beliefs and practices that are endowed by such s! ome kind of ascendency . This thinker as wholesome believed that there was nothing neither prognosticate nor wizardly because he maxim that it was just society that produced this concept in to keep people in line and to give speech pattern on certain things that the society should value as a whole Society had survived from civilizations that have started in the prehistorical The question whether how religion was formed was important to answer because defines the go on need for it . Is it a mere creation of man that humanness exists ? If not , then why did it exist because of the perseverance of the human spirit ? Where did this perseverance come from more than that , where did the spirit come from ? These are things the society cannot really provide for them if the premise is society gave birth to religionAlienationKarl Marx , of all the thinkers in the agone may have presented one of the most scornful and sarcastic contempt at religion (Pals 139 . Most of the discussion about religion from this philosopher referred to religion as alienation . He never really just concentrated on discussing religion alone but his whole kit have shown how he had pretty much a lowering opinion about it and that influenced the structure of CommunismIt was plain and straightforward for Marx , religion is pure illusion (Pals 138 .

Similar to how Freud saw religion , Marx saw it more than an illusion but something that was dangerous and something that should be eradicated from society (Pals 138He considered religion as the worst kind of political orientation because of how it verbalized a perceived bu nch of excuses dressed as reasons in to keep society ! in the manner that their heaviness would like them to stay as (Pals 138 . Religion is then related to a to a faultl of oppression instead of being a liberating promoter that most Christian ideals adhere toSince he was consumed with how he taught a capitalist society brought about oppression he saw religion as merely another fixings to keep people in line and to prevent them from having to go against the leaders of society . Since most of his arguments fall upon his hatred for the capitalistic society , he attacked religion saying it was fully pertinacious by economics that made all the doctrines that was attributed to it to have no merits of their own (Pals 138 . Since he had no respect for that kind of brass , he did not see much of the structure and reputation of religion as well (Pals 138Marx found a cloggy proportionateness between religion and socioeconomics wherein he saw how 2 areas of society alienated people from important parts of who they were (Pals cxl . wh ile religion took moral values socioeconomics took productive crowd (Pals 140-141Religion took a way a part of the people , the morality part as humans and attributed it to a wholly ideational being (Pals 141 . Marx saw how it took away the credit from the people and awarded everything to God (Pals 141 . On the other hand , socioeconomics took away the fruits of the labor of the people and awarded it to whoever had the money to pay mostly to the rich (Pals 141 . Marx saw how these two concepts were too much alike because of how they were related to each other . alike Durkheim , he saw that the capitalist society created religion as economics was the base for everythingHe then moved for the abolition of religion under the Communist ideology as this was considered an unreal rejoicing (Pals 141 According to him , the abolition of religion was rattling call for for real happiness to occur (Pals 141 . He saw that religion did not help the people , most especially the piteous . F or him , religion only created fantasies for the peop! le that enabled them to ease the pain they felt from the oppression of society (Pals 141 . He saw religion as the opium of the poor (Pals 140He illustrated religion as nothing more than being dependency to any form of drug (Pals 142 . It may be a form of escape that would make a person worry-free for a while but it does not serve anything (Pals 142 He saw religion as pure escapism (Pals 142 . Religion , for Marx , only shifted the gaze of the people and their reliance on God instead of having to rely upon themselves for their own well-being (Pals 142 However , he also said that it blinded the people from the real impairment of the clobber , physical situation they had in society because they were much to focal point on fixing their second life or their ever-living life in heaven to be unhappy about their current stature on earth (Pals 142The fact that religion was seen to oppress can be reflected in wrong leadership on the part of the Church in the past but it cannot general ize the whole body of believers . If a person plant for this current life with disregard for the consequences of the next life , what is he to gain ? Is he to be satisfied ? No person had ever found the ultimate satisfaction , no question how hard they work or how wealthy they are , this cannot be attained in the present life . Whoever says he or she can must be fooling him or herself . trust on a supreme being is placed in the fiber of human nature for a reason , because they need God It is not to oppress them to being disoriented beings . It actually empowers them to be the best that they can become with the help from their creatorConclusionNo matter what such thinkers present regarding the false hopes and the perception of believers regarding religion , there are still so much areas that remain uncontroversial . There are still areas in the dramaturgy of religion that remain to be untouched and simply ignore . The areas that cannot be explained cannot be test by scientif ic comment . There are areas that can be denied that! they exist even if they battle that religion does notIf religion was birthed out of society , and there are a lot of atheists that can almost form a community out of themselves , how come they do not just create their own society that could affect the society of believers in the world ? The argument about faith and the universe of God had been a long withstanding debate for centuries now and still , the world still contain a large body of believers that are willing to put faith first in the first place reason . Does this make these people unintelligent beings ? There had been thinkers as well who had defended the faith that had chosen to believe because they saw how reason cannot overcome everything , only faith can do thatThe worldly concern of religion cannot only be out of the desires of the leaders to keep society in line . It takes more than human power to be able to sustain this for centuries . If it was placed in the hold of mere humans , then there must have been a tim e wherein atheists have struggled for power and took the reigns of society to dispel the mindset . The protection around the concept of religion speaks slews for itself . It takes predict power to be able to stay significant for centuries for different peoples all over the worldWorks CitedPals , Daniel L . Seven Theories of Religion . smart York : Oxford University Press , 1996Palmer , Michael . The question of God : An introduction and Sourcebook sassy York : Routledge , 2001PAGE 1 ...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay